A surprising share of iGaming sites block GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot or CCBot — usually by inheriting a restrictive robots.txt from a platform provider or a WAF rule nobody reviewed.
Your firewall is refusing GPTBot and PerplexityBot and nobody knows when it started. Every placement campaign you run is undermined by models being unable to fetch your site when they try to verify a claim about you.
This is the cheapest work in the whole GEO programme and it gates everything else. There is no point running placement campaigns if the engines can't fetch your site when they try to verify a claim about you.
Everything here runs on the same reporting as the rest of our work: first-time deposits, cost per acquisition and lifetime value, with rankings treated as an input rather than the result. You will work directly with the person doing the work, and you can end the engagement on thirty days' notice at any point.
No discovery phase that produces a deck. The first deliverable is in your hands inside two weeks.
Access audit across every major AI user agent
WAF, Cloudflare and bot management rule review and remediation
llms.txt authored and deployed, pointing at what you want quoted
Server log verification that the crawlers are arriving and succeeding
If you want to be cited, yes. Blocking is a defensible choice for publishers protecting paid content; for an operator trying to acquire players it's self-harm.
Adoption is partial and it isn't a ranking factor. It's cheap, it's a clear signal of intent, and it costs an afternoon.
Frequently, and by default in some configurations. It's the first thing we check.
If you want to be cited, yes. Blocking makes sense for publishers protecting paid content. For an operator trying to acquire players it's self-harm.
Adoption is partial and it isn't a ranking factor. It costs an afternoon, it signals intent clearly, and the downside is zero. We'd do it and not think about it again.
Four commitments that apply to every engagement, written down so you can hold us to them.
You see the site, the anchor and the cost before anything is bought. No monthly link count standing in for a strategy, and nothing we would not point at our own revenue.
Dashboards tied to first-time deposits, cost per acquisition and lifetime value. Rankings are an input we manage; they are not what we ask you to judge us on.
If the audit says you do not need an agency yet, or that a migration you are planning is a bad idea, you will hear it. A retainer that was never going to work costs us more than it costs you.
We will not take two clients chasing the same head terms in the same market. If there is a conflict you will hear about it on the first call, not three months in.
A free audit covering technical debt, your live link profile, the keyword gap against the operators beating you, and where you currently sit inside AI answers. You keep it either way.
Request the free audit